<h2><span class="header-section-number">7.3</span> Variable importance for the principal components</h2>
<p>The first PC nicely separates wells containing various controls from the ones treated with siRNAs. As every component is simply a weighted sum of the original variables, we can inspect these weights (called “loadings”) to see which classes “drive” the components.</p>
<p>The first PC nicely separates wells containing various controls from the ones treated with siRNAs. As every component is simply a weighted sum of the original variables, we can inspect these weights (called “loadings”) to see which classes “drive” the components and try to interpret what we find.</p>
<span class="co"># geom_hline(aes(yintercept = -0.25, color = I("coral3")))</span></code></pre></div>
<p>We can see that e.g. the “inter” and the “map /prometa” classes as well as the “apo” class are important for PC1. The map and prometa classes combined define cells that are in mitotic delay / arrest, while the interphase class defines a control category.</p>
<p>So a possible explanation for PC1 would be that it separates cells in mitotic arrest/delay from cells in the interphase as well as apoptotic cells. (c.f. Figure 1 of <span class="citation">Neumann et al. (2010)</span>).</p>
<p>So a possible explanation for PC1 would be that it separates wells with cells in mitotic arrest/delay (or apoptotic cells) from control wells with many cells in the interphase phase. (c.f. Figure 1 of <span class="citation">Neumann et al. (2010)</span>).</p>
<p>The second principal component seems to separate wells that contain mainly cells in ana–/metaphase from wells that predominantly contains cells with strange shape phenotypes.</p>